Choice Company directory
Gildan — Company research | Choice 0 Choice score Out of 100

Does this score look right?

Updated

What Choice found

The CPSC alleged that Gildan Activewear SRL failed to promptly report a hazard involving youth hooded sweatshirts with drawstrings; the garments were recalled in 2006. Gildan denied knowingly violating the law and said it reported the hazard when it had actual knowledge. In a settlement, the subsidiary agreed to a $35,000 civil penalty without admitting a violation; the Commission provisionally accepted the agreement in April 2008.

Against Corporate conduct
Sources
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2008/04/29/E8-9263/gildan-activewear-srl-a-corporation-provisional-acceptance-of-a-settlement-agreement-and-order
14. Gildan knowingly failed to inform the Commission about the Drawstring Sweatshirts immediately as required by CPSA sections 15(b)(2) and (3), 15 U.S.C. 2064(b)(2) and (3), and as the term “knowingly” is defined in CPSA section 20(d), 15 U.S.C. 2069(d). This failure violated CPSA section 19(a)(4), 15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(4). Pursuant to CPSA section 20, 15 U.S.C. 2069, this failure subjected Gildan to civil penalties.
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2008/04/29/E8-9263/gildan-activewear-srl-a-corporation-provisional-acceptance-of-a-settlement-agreement-and-order
4. Between January 2006 and September 2006, Gildan manufactured 146,466 youth hooded sweatshirts with drawstrings through the hoods for sale in the United States (“Drawstring Sweatshirts”).

A 2017 report cited labor-rights violations identified by the Workers Rights Consortium at Gildan facilities and said there was no independent documented evidence supporting claims that its Honduran factories were sweatshop-free. Gildan disputed the allegations and defended its standards. Separately, Honduras’ Supreme Court later ruled Gildan violated labor laws and ordered five workers rehired.

Against Labor & working conditions
Sources
https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/honduras-allegations-of-labour-rights-abuses-at-gildans-factories-clash-with-subsidiary-american-apparels-ethical-claims-says-ngo-gildan-disputes-claims/
[American Apparel] was sold to Gildan and moved operations outside the US – now the idea the brand was based upon clashes with what workers actually experience…American Apparel … swapped its “Made in USA” mantra with the phrase “Globally-Sourced,” as most of its apparel is now sourced from factories based in Central America, primarily in Honduras… American Apparel maintains all their products remain ethically made and sweatshop free…[but] many claim that the reality for garment workers is far from the glossy facade it has projected since Gildan acquired the company nine months ago…Gary Bell, vice-president of communications at Gildan, said…the parallels between Gildan’s brand and that of American Apparel are pretty straightforward. “Our corporate social responsibility program is an assurance that former American Apparel customers can basically take and feel just as confident that these products are ethically-made and sweatshop free… the important thing for us is to build our system in such a way so we can continuously improve on the value we deliver to our employees." The Workers Rights Consortium (WRC)…has identified significant labour rights violations in a number of wholly owned Gildan facilities in recent years…In the eyes of the WRC, and other labour organizations both in the US and abroad, there is no independent documented evidence to suggest that any Gildan facility in Honduras can be termed ethically made and sweatshop free...
https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/gildan-on-the-hot-seat-again-for-sweatshop-abuses-in-honduras/
The Montreal-based T-shirt manufacturer Gildan Activewear was recently in the news for allegations of worker rights violations at a Gildan-owned factory in Honduras.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-gildan-ceo-chamandy-tyra-timeline/
Mr. Chamandy’s record as CEO has also been scrutinized amidst the drama. Last year, Honduras’ Supreme Court of Justice determined that Gildan had violated the country’s labour laws and ordered the company to rehire five workers who had been unlawfully terminated years earlier. Robyn Doolittle, Nicolas Van Praet and Andrew Willis spoke to one of the five workers, Rosa Dalila López Corea, about her experience and the company’s labour practices abroad.

Gildan dismissed CEO and co-founder Glenn Chamandy in December 2023 after 20 years and announced Vince Tyra, formerly of Fruit of the Loom, as his replacement in February 2024. The board said it lost confidence in Chamandy amid a succession-planning dispute and an ultimatum involving takeover proposals. A report commissioned by Gildan concluded the succession process was proper.

You decide Corporate conduct
Sources
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-gildan-ceo-chamandy-tyra-timeline/
Gildan dismissed its chief executive and co-founder Glenn Chamandy last December after a 20-year tenure. The company announced he would be replaced in February, 2024, by former Fruit of the Loom executive Vince Tyra.

The FTC investigated Gildan Activewear SRL and distributor S&S Holdings after learning their contract restricted Gildan from offering certain prices and discounts to S&S competitors. The parties amended the agreement to preserve Gildan’s discretion to set prices and offer support to other North American distributors. The FTC then closed its investigation into potential Robinson-Patman Act violations; it announced the resolution in October 2026.

Against Corporate conduct
Sources
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/10/ftc-secures-fair-pricing-protections-taking-action-against-major-wholesale-t-shirt-distributors
The FTC opened an investigation into Gildan and S&S after becoming aware that S&S’s contract with Gildan prohibited Gildan from offering certain pricing and discounts given to S&S to S&S’s competitors.

OpenSecrets reports $2,927 in contributions associated with Gildan for the 2024 cycle, all from individuals rather than the organization itself. Of that total, $2,162 went to Republicans and $609 to Democrats; the largest listed recipient was Donald Trump, at $2,132. Totals include subsidiaries and affiliates.

You decide Political spending
Sources
https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/gildan/totals?id=D000046125
<table id="DataTables_Table_0"> <thead> <tr><th rowspan="1" colspan="1">Cycle</th><th rowspan="1" colspan="1">Total</th><th rowspan="1" colspan="1">Democrats</th><th rowspan="1" colspan="1">% to Dems</th><th rowspan="1" colspan="1">Republicans</th><th rowspan="1" colspan="1">% to Repubs</th></tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>2024</td> <td>$2,927</td> <td>$609</td> <td>21.98%</td> <td>$2,162</td> <td>78.02%</td> </tr><tr> <td>2022</td> <td>$2,909</td> <td>$0</td> <td>0.00%</td> <td>$2,909</td> <td>100.00%</td> </tr><tr> <td>2020</td> <td>$2,361</td> <td>$1,358</td> <td>57.52%</td> <td>$1,003</td> <td>42.48%</td> </tr><tr> <td>2018</td> <td>$1,779</td> <td>$29</td> <td>1.63%</td> <td>$1,750</td> <td>98.37%</td> </tr><tr> <td>2016</td> <td>$6,900</td> <td>$0</td> <td>0.00%</td> <td>$6,900</td> <td>100.00%</td> </tr><tr> <td>2014</td> <td>$2,000</td> <td>$0</td> <td>0.00%</td> <td>$2,000</td> <td>100.00%</td> </tr><tr> <td>2012</td> <td>$0</td> <td>$0</td> <td>0.00%</td> <td>$0</td> <td>0.00%</td> </tr><tr> <td>2010</td> <td>$0</td> <td>$0</td> <td>0.00%</td> <td>$0</td> <td>0.00%</td> </tr><tr> <td>2008</td> <td>$500</td> <td>$0</td> <td>0.00%</td> <td>$500</td> <td>100.00%</td> </tr><tr> <td>2006</td> <td>$250</td> <td>$0</td> <td>0.00%</td> <td>$250</td> <td>100.00%</td> </tr></tbody> </table>
https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/gildan/summary?id=D000046125
<table id="DataTables_Table_0"> <thead> <tr><th rowspan="1" colspan="1">Recipient</th><th rowspan="1" colspan="1">Total</th><th rowspan="1" colspan="1">From Individualsimore info </th><th rowspan="1" colspan="1">From Organizationimore info </th><th rowspan="1" colspan="1">Typeimore info </th><th rowspan="1" colspan="1">view</th></tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td>Trump, Donald</td> <td>$2,132</td> <td>$2,132</td> <td>$0</td> <td>Candidate (R-PRES)</td> <td>Republican</td> </tr><tr> <td>Harris, Kamala</td> <td>$569</td> <td>$569</td> <td>$0</td> <td>Candidate (D-PRES)</td> <td>Democrat</td> </tr><tr> <td>Libertarian National Cmte</td> <td>$153</td> <td>$153</td> <td>$0</td> <td>Political Party</td> <td>Other Party</td> </tr><tr> <td>Haley, Nikki</td> <td>$25</td> <td>$25</td> <td>$0</td> <td>Candidate (R-PRES)</td> <td>Republican</td> </tr><tr> <td>DNC Services Corp</td> <td>$20</td> <td>$20</td> <td>$0</td> <td>Political Party</td> <td>Democrat</td> </tr><tr> <td>Martin, Isaiah</td> <td>$20</td> <td>$20</td> <td>$0</td> <td>Candidate (D-TX18)</td> <td>Democrat</td> </tr><tr> <td>Hutchinson, W. Asa</td> <td>$5</td> <td>$5</td> <td>$0</td> <td>Candidate (R-PRES)</td> <td>Republican</td> </tr><tr> <td>Retired Americans PAC</td> <td>$3</td> <td>$3</td> <td>$0</td> <td>Outside Group</td> <td>Liberal</td> </tr></tbody> <tfoot> <tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="5"> Liberal/Democrat Conservative/Republican No View </td></tr> <tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="5">View All Recipients</td></tr> </tfoot> </table>

OpenSecrets lists $150,000 in federal lobbying for Gildan in 2026, all attributed to subsidiaries rather than direct spending by the client. Its subsidiary table attributes the $150,000 to Gildan Activewear. The page was updated July 23, 2026, and says current-year figures cover spending through June 30.

You decide Political spending
Sources
About & ownership
Legal name
Gildan Activewear Inc.
Category
Textile Products
Website
gildan.com
Stock listing
NYSE:GIL