Choice Company directory
Lamb Weston — Company research | Choice 8 Choice score Out of 100

Does this score look right?

Updated

What Choice found

Consumers and Redner’s Markets have alleged that Lamb Weston and other frozen-potato producers coordinated price increases and shared sensitive information, including through a data service. In September 2026, a federal judge declined to dismiss core antitrust claims. Lamb Weston denied the allegations, said it would vigorously defend itself, and stated it competes fairly.

Against Corporate conduct
Sources
https://www.idahostatesman.com/news/business/article297363759.html
The company faces allegations of illegal price fixing alongside Boise agribusiness giant J.R. Simplot and two other frozen-potato companies.
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/antitrust/lamb-weston-cavendish-sued-in-potato-cartel-price-fixing-case
Lamb Weston Holdings Inc. and Cavendish Farms Inc. are among a group of food companies hit with a proposed class action alleging they colluded to fix and raise the price of frozen potatoes with help from a data aggregation service.
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/antitrust/cavendish-farms-lamb-weston-fail-to-escape-potato-cartel-claims
Cavendish Farms Inc., Lamb Weston Holdings Inc., and other food manufacturers fell short in their bid to shake antitrust claims that they exchanged competitively sensitive data to fix prices for frozen potato products through an unlawful multiyear agreement.
https://www.idahostatesman.com/news/business/article295930744.html
The lawsuit, brought by Redner’s Markets, an employee-owned supermarket chain based in Pennsylvania, on behalf of itself and others, accuses the companies of illegally coordinating an effort to implement lockstep price increases since at least 2021 in violation of the Sherman Act, a federal law that prohibits anticompetitive agreements and conduct that monopolizes or attempts to monopolize a certain market.
https://www.law360.com/cases/6737caf5d34bc27c67a5e391
The four companies controlling roughly 98% of the frozen potato product market must face consumers' accusations that they shared competitively sensitive information and coordinated other efforts to carry out an illegal price-fixing scheme, an Illinois federal judge has ruled.

Teamsters Local 839 filed an NLRB charge against Lamb Weston on March 3, 2025, alleging coercive actions including surveillance at the company’s Pasco, Washington location. The case was listed as closed; the docket records an NLRB approval of a withdrawal request dated August 11, 2026. The charge is an allegation, not a finding.

Against Labor & working conditions
Sources
https://www.nlrb.gov/case/19-CA-361382
8(a)(1) Coercive Actions (Surveillance, etc)

OSHA records a complaint inspection at Lamb Weston’s Quincy, Washington plant, opened February 9, 2022, and closed October 11, 2023. The inspection initially listed one serious and two other violations, with $6,300 in initial penalties. After a December 20, 2022 formal settlement, current penalties were zero and two citations were deleted; one remained current.

Against Labor & working conditions
Sources
http://web.archive.org/web/20250218203537/https://www.osha.gov/ords/imis/establishment.inspection_detail?id=1577950.015
<table> <caption>Violation Items</caption> <tbody><tr> <th scope="col">#</th> <th scope="col">Citation ID</th> <th scope="col">Citaton Type</th> <th scope="col">Standard Cited</th> <th scope="col">Issuance Date</th> <th scope="col">Abatement Due Date</th> <th scope="col">Current Penalty</th> <th scope="col">Initial Penalty</th> <th scope="col">FTA Penalty</th> <th scope="col">Contest</th> <th scope="col">Latest Event</th> <th scope="col">Note</th> </tr> <tr> <th scope="row">1.</th> <td>01001</td> <td>Serious</td> <td>296-67-037(6)(A)</td> <td>07/21/2022</td> <td>08/23/2022</td> <td> $0</td> <td> $2,100</td> <td> $0</td> <td>12/20/2022</td> <td>F - Formal Settlement</td> <td>Citation has been deleted.</td> </tr> <tr> <th scope="row">2.</th> <td>01002</td> <td>Other</td> <td>296-67-053</td> <td>07/21/2022</td> <td>10/20/2022</td> <td> $0</td> <td> $2,100</td> <td> $0</td> <td>12/20/2022</td> <td>F - Formal Settlement</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <th scope="row">3.</th> <td>02001</td> <td>Other</td> <td>296-802-20010</td> <td>07/21/2022</td> <td>02/09/2022</td> <td> $0</td> <td> $2,100</td> <td> $0</td> <td>12/20/2022</td> <td>F - Formal Settlement</td> <td>Citation has been deleted.</td> </tr> </tbody></table>

A federal district court ruled that a former Lamb Weston production employee could not proceed on Washington sexual-harassment and retaliation claims. She alleged that a male supervisor touched her without consent and tried to kiss her about a year before her discharge. The court cited isolated incidents and insufficient evidence of threats, humiliation or a causal link to her firing.

Against Workplace equity
Sources
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/case-discrimination-sexual-harassment-e-d-wash
A Lamb Weston, Inc. female production department employee alleging subjection to a male supervisor’s unwanted touching and attempt to kiss her roughly a year prior to her discharge can’t proceed on her Washington Law Against Discrimination sexual harassment and retaliation claims, a federal district court ruled, where the incidents were isolated, she didn’t testify of being threatened or humiliated, nor did she provide evidence of causality between her sexual harassment complaint and her firing.

A Teamsters Local 839 charging party filed an NLRB charge against Lamb Weston in Pasco, Washington, on February 21, 2025, titled “8(a)(1) Coercive Actions (Surveillance, etc).” The case is listed as closed; the docket records an NLRB General Counsel letter approving a withdrawal request on May 26, 2026. The allegation is not established by the docket information provided.

Against Labor & working conditions
Sources
https://www.nlrb.gov/case/19-CA-360835
8(a)(1) Coercive Actions (Surveillance, etc)

The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 983, filed an NLRB charge against Lamb Weston’s American Falls, Idaho plant on June 4, 2021, alleging refusal to furnish information. The NLRB docket lists the case as closed and records approval of a withdrawal request on October 6, 2021; it does not establish the allegation.

Against Labor & working conditions
Sources
https://www.nlrb.gov/case/27-CA-278135
8(a)(5) Refusal to Furnish Information

After a rumor that ICE visited its Lamb Weston RDO potato plant south of Park Rapids, the company told the Park Rapids Enterprise on January 12 that it was proud to be a significant local employer and required workers to be authorized to work in the U.S. It said it was unaware of any employees detained by ICE and generally would direct such questions to law enforcement.

In favor Immigration
Sources
https://www.parkrapidsenterprise.com/news/local/ice-agents-observed-in-park-rapids
Regarding a rumor that ICE visited the Lamb Weston RDO potato plant, south of Park Rapids, in a statement to the Enterprise on Monday, Jan. 12, a Lamb Weston representative wrote, “Lamb Weston is proud to be a significant employer in Park Rapids. We have a rigorous employment verification process, requiring all team members to be fully authorized to work in the U.S. While we generally don’t comment on issues of this nature and would direct any questions to law enforcement, we are not aware of any Lamb Weston employees being detained by ICE.”

Teamsters Local 839 filed an NLRB charge against Lamb Weston in Pasco, Washington, on July 20, 2026, alleging refusal to furnish information. The case was listed as open, and the docket showed a signed charge filed by the charging party. The allegation had not been resolved in the supplied record.

Against Labor & working conditions
Sources
https://www.nlrb.gov/case/19-CA-390976
8(a)(5) Refusal to Furnish Information

An NLRB case entry lists an allegation against Lamb Weston of repudiating or modifying a contract, including unilateral changes under Section 8(d). The supplied entry provides no filing date, location, case status, charging party or outcome.

Against Labor & working conditions
Sources
https://www.nlrb.gov/case/27-CA-372901
8(a)(5) Repudiation/Modification of Contract [Sec 8(d)/Unilateral Changes]
About & ownership
Category
Food Products
Website
lambweston.com
Stock listing
NYSE:LW

Jan Craps · Executive Chair

Mike Smith · President and Chief Executive Officer of Lamb Weston and serves on the company’s Board of Directors · CEO

Bradley Alford · Lead Independent Director

Alternatives to Lamb Weston