Choice Company directory
Purina — Company research | Choice 22 Choice score Out of 100

Does this score look right?

Updated

What Choice found

In 2015, consumers sued Nestlé USA and Nestlé Purina, alleging that seafood used in Fancy Feast and other Purina products came from forced labor in Thailand and that the companies failed to disclose the risk. Nestlé said forced labor had no place in its supply chain and reported finding labor abuses; it planned audits and other steps. The allegations were not established as findings in the supplied evidence.

Against Labor & working conditions
Sources
https://api.courthousenews.com/slave-labor-makes-purina-cat-food-class-says/
LOS ANGELES (CN) – Nestle Purina profits from slave labor to make its Fancy Feast cat food with fish, consumers claim in a federal class action. The lawsuit cites a July 27 New York Times report, “Sea Slaves: The Human Misery that Feeds Pets and Livestock,” on men and boys sold into slavery in Southeast Asia to trawl for fish off Thailand. Men who escaped from the fishing boats after spending up to three years at sea told the Times of appalling conditions: being forced to work up to 20 hours a day for little or no pay, and being beaten or murdered if they are disobedient or try to escape. Lead plaintiff Melanie Barber claims that Nestle Purina’s Fancy Feast cat food uses fish produced by the forced labor. The supply chain starts on boats manned by slaves, which send the fish to “motherships,” which deliver it to canning factories. Nestle partners with Thai Union Frozen Products, which imports the pet food into the United States, according to the complaint. The Thai company is not a defendant in the Aug. 27 complaint. “In summary, although Nestle recognizes that the use of slave labor in its supply chain is wrong and its corporate business principles explicitly forbid slave labor by its suppliers, it materially omits to disclose to consumers purchasing Fancy Feast the likelihood that slave labor was used to source the seafood making up the product,” the lawsuit states. The consumers’ attorney Steve Berman told Bloomberg news service that Nestle “effectively tricked millions of consumers into supporting and encouraging slave labor on floating prisons.” “It’s a fact that the thousands of purchasers of its top-selling pet food products would not have bought this brand had they known the truth – that hundreds of individuals are enslaved, beaten or even murdered in the production of its pet food,” Berman said. Nestle told Bloomberg that forced labor “has no
https://www.motherjones.com/food/2015/11/nestle-finds-forced-labor-its-seafood-supply-chain/
On Monday, Nestlé admitted that it had found indications of forced labor, human trafficking, and child labor in its supply chain in Thailand, where the Switzerland-based company sources some of the seafood that it sells in supermarkets around the world, including in the United States. The findings came after an internal investigation that was launched by Nestlé in December last year, following reports by media and NGOs that linked the company’s shrimp, prawns, and Purina brand pet foods with abusive working conditions.

Colorado’s health department fined Purina $7,000 after an inspector found the Denver plant’s October 2023 odor exceeded state limits; the company agreed to follow state rules and Denver’s odor-control plan. Separately, Denver residents sued in May 2024, alleging recurring fumes harmed property values and quality of life; Purina said it could not comment on pending litigation.

Against Climate & energy
Sources
https://www.westword.com/news/colorado-purina-plant-fined-again-pet-food-factory-bad-smell-21910532/
The Purina factory in northeast Denver next to Interstate 70 recently received a $7,000 penalty from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment for exceeding odorous air contamination laws in 2023. It’s the second time in two years the plant has been cited for stinking up the area.
https://nypost.com/2024/05/29/us-news/neighbors-sue-denver-nestle-purina-petcare-plant-over-noxious-smell/
Nestle-Purina has failed to maintain the required equipment to mitigate the terrible smell despite years of complaints from residents, according to the suit.

In a March 8, 2022 warning letter, the FDA said an inspection of Purina Animal Nutrition’s Gonzales, Texas, facility found animal-food safety violations after a 2021 recall of four products for elevated urea. The agency cited inadequate hazard controls and contamination precautions, and said affected food was distributed and a buyer was not promptly notified. The letter gave the company an opportunity to correct the issues.

Against Manufacturing
Sources
https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/warning-letters/purina-animal-nutrition-llc-622828-03082022
Your reliance on prerequisite programs in your food safety plan failed to reduce the probability that the presence of an unsafe level of urea will occur in the absence of a preventive control. Your firm uses urea as an ingredient in some of your products; however, your firm failed to implement your prerequisite programs to ensure that your animal food products did not contain an excess of urea, which is a known or reasonably foreseeable hazard for ruminants, that could occur in the absence of a preventive control.

On October 30, 2018, Purina said it would stop contributing to Rep. Steve King’s campaign, saying his recent statements conflicted with its values. The company said its PAC typically supported elected officials of both parties representing communities where it operates. The announcement followed online boycott calls and criticism of King’s comments and associations.

In favor Political spending
Sources
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/purina-land-olakes-cuts-ties-to-gops-steve-king-after-boycott-threats/
Our PAC contributions are typically made to elected officials from both parties who represent the local communities where we have operations and associates. Representative King’s recent statements are in conflict with our values and we are no longer contributing to his campaign.
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/413934-purina-drops-campaign-contributions-to-steve-king-citing-recent-statements/
Pet food company Purina announced Tuesday that it will no longer make campaign contributions to Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), becoming the latest company to do so as King faces criticism for past comments in support of white nationalist politicians. "Our PAC contributions are typically made to elected officials from both parties who represent the local communities where we have operations and associates. Representative King’s recent statements are in conflict with our values and we are no longer contributing to his campaign," Purina wrote in a tweet in response to journalist Judd Legum, who had asked why Purina donated to King.Our PAC contributions are typically made to elected officials from both parties who represent the local communities where we have operations and associates. Representative King’s recent statements are in conflict with our values and we are no longer contributing to his campaign.— Purina (@Purina) October 30, 2018{mosads}Dairy company Land O'Lakes and tech giant Intel Corp. also determined in recent days that they will no longer support King's campaign with financial contributions.  King has recently faced criticism for comments he has made against diversity and in support of white nationalism.On Saturday, King defended his ties to the Austria Freedom Party, a group founded by a former Nazi SS officer. He told The Washington Post that if the party were in the United States, it would be Republican.King has also previously said "diversity is not our strength," voiced support for a white nationalist candidate in Canada and retweeted a self-described Nazi sympathizer.Rep. Steve Stivers (R-Ohio), the chairman of the House GOP campaign arm, on Tuesday condemned King over his "recent comments, actions, and retweets.""Congressman Steve King’s recent comments, actions, and retweets are completely inappropriate. We must stand up against white supremacy and hate in all forms, and I strongly condemn this behavior," Stivers tweeted.King on Tuesday responded to what he described as "attacks" against him, claiming in a tweet that they are "orchestrated by nasty, desperate, and dishonest fake news" with the goal of impeaching President Trump.King, who is seeking reelection in next week's midterm, faces a potentially close race against Democratic challenger J.D. Scholten in Iowa's 4th Congressional District. A poll released Tuesday showed King with only a 1-point lead in the race.

In July 2024, Nestlé Purina data and analytics director Jennifer Peters said the company had created a robotics specialist position within the previous five years to work with data scientists and engineers. She described AI as a way to support manufacturing workers with timely information and said intentional implementation and employee engagement were important to sustaining benefits.

In favor AI & automation
Sources
https://www.manufacturingdive.com/news/ai-adoption-plans-factories-benefits-nestle-purina/722835/
Although AI is optimizing and automating many traditional manufacturing roles, the technology is also changing the type of roles needed to keep production moving. For instance, Peters said Nestlé Purina created a robotics specialist role in the last five years to work alongside data scientists and engineers in its factories.

FEC records for the Nestlé Purina PetCare Company Political Election Team show $20,475 in receipts and $113,131.29 in disbursements for January 1, 2023–September 30, 2024. The committee was listed as terminated; the records shown do not identify recipients or the political direction of its spending.

You decide Political spending
Sources
https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00338335/
<table> <tr> <td>Total receipts</td> <td>$20,475.00 </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Total contributions</td> <td>$20,475.00 </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Total individual contributions</td> <td>$20,475.00 </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Itemized individual contributions</td> <td>$550.00 </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Unitemized individual contributions</td> <td>$19,925.00 </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Party committee contributions</td> <td>$0.00 </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Other committee contributions</td> <td>$0.00 </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Presidential public funds</td> <td>$0.00 </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Transfers from affiliated committees</td> <td>$0.00 </td> </tr> <tr> <td>All loans received</td> <td>$0.00 </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Loan repayments received</td> <td>$0.00 </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Offsets to operating expenditures</td> <td>$0.00 </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Candidate refunds</td> <td>$0.00 </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Other Receipts</td> <td>$0.00 </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Total transfers</td> <td>$0.00 </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Nonfederal transfers</td> <td>$0.00 </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Levin funds</td> <td>$0.00 </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Total federal receipts</td> <td>$20,475.00 </td> </tr> </table>

On April 30, 2025, WFMZ reported that Nestlé Purina workers represented by Teamsters Local 773 agreed to a new contract, ending a seven-week strike at the South Whitehall Township plant. The union said the deal includes wage increases, a faster grievance process and stronger protections. Purina had said it activated a contingency plan to maintain basic operations.

You decide Labor & working conditions
Sources
https://www.wfmz.com/news/area/lehighvalley/lehigh-county/allentown-area/strike-at-nestle-purina-plant-in-south-whitehall-twp-ends-union-and-company-agree-to/article_ea58039d-71ef-45d8-bbef-fe95790e962a.html
Nestle Purina previously said it had activated a contingency plan that would allow it to maintain basic operations with minimal disruption to its product supply during the strike.

An OSHA record for Nestlé Purina PetCare lists a serious citation under the hazardous-energy control (lockout/tagout) standard, issued May 21, 2020. It recorded six instances and four workers exposed, with an initial penalty of $5,682; an informal settlement on June 18 set the current penalty at $0. The citation item is now deleted.

Against Labor & working conditions
Sources

A June 25, 2025 Law.com report said a rival was stepping up to challenge Purina Animal Nutrition’s claim that its poultry feed provides a “built-in defense against avian influenza.” The supplied article excerpt gives no details about the rival, the challenge’s basis or any outcome; the claim is attributed to Purina.

You decide Corporate conduct
Sources
http://web.archive.org/web/20250629073942/https://www.law.com/corpcounsel/2025/06/25/rival-steps-up-to-challenge-purinas-claim-that-its-poultry-feed-fights-off-bird-flu/
Purina Animal Nutrition claims its poultry feed offers a “built-in defense against avian influenza.” That’s music to the ears of farmers hammered by the bird flu epidemic.

OpenSecrets reported that Nestle Purina PetCare PAC contributed $44,250 to federal candidates during the 2019–2020 cycle: $30,750 to Republicans and $13,500 to Democrats. The candidate-recipient data, based on Federal Election Commission releases, shows contributions across House and Senate races; this records political donations, not the recipients’ positions on particular issues.

You decide Political spending
Sources
http://web.archive.org/web/20211030153445/https://www.opensecrets.org/political-action-committees-pacs/nestle-purina-petcare/C00338335/summary/2020
31.21% to Democrats, 68.79% to Republicans</td> <td>$43,250</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Contributions to this PAC from individual donors of $200 or more (list donors)</td> <td>$4,320</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>

Spokane Riverkeeper sued Purina Animal Nutrition in federal court in Washington on April 2, 2025, alleging the company violated Clean Water Act requirements at its Spokane facility and polluted the Spokane River. The complaint says Purina failed to follow permit conditions, including stormwater-management, prevention-plan, sampling and monitoring requirements; the evidence does not report an outcome.

Against Climate & energy
Sources
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/litigation/purina-animal-nutrition-sued-over-washington-facility-pollution
Purina Animal Nutrition LLC was accused in a new lawsuit of failing to control stormwater pollution from its Spokane, Wash., facility in violation of the Clean Water Act.
About & ownership
Owned by
Nestlé
Website
purina.com