Choice can get this wrong — tell us if something's off.
1–10 of 10
Corporate conductConfirmed
Hyatt has documented email exchanges with Jeffrey Epstein
The billionaire who has overseen Hyatt since 2004 acknowledged serious errors in judgment after documents showed he exchanged at least 20 emails with Epstein from 2010 to early 2019.
The billionaire, who has overseen Hyatt since 2004 and is a cousin of Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, acknowledged serious errors in judgment after documents showed he exchanged at least 20 emails with Epstein over more than a decade after the financier’s 2008 conviction — from at least 2010 through early 2019.
Privacy & surveillanceConfirmed
Hyatt warns customers of credit data breach
Hyatt alerts customers that hackers may have stolen some of their credit information in a recent attack.
Hyatt officials are advising customers to monitor their credit card statements. It is believed that hackers may have stolen credit card numbers from their computer systems.
The Hyatt Hotel chain is warning it's customers that they may have had some of their credit information stolen in a recent attack by hackers.
Labor & working conditionsConfirmed
Hyatt Regency Long Beach was ordered to pay $4.8 million in fines for failing to rehire workers laid off during COVID-19 shutdowns
California's labor commissioner on Tuesday ordered the Hyatt Regency Long Beach to pay nearly $4.8 million in fines for failing to offer jobs to workers who had been laid off during COVID-19 shutdowns.
California's labor commissioner on Tuesday ordered the Hyatt Regency Long Beach to pay nearly $4.8 million in fines for failing to offer jobs to workers who had been laid off during COVID-19 shutdowns.
Corporate conductRuling
Hyatt was ordered to cease and desist from offering or selling securities through fraudulent means
The final decision involving Hyatt concerns money or property.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant Hyatt, his officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with him who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise, and each of them are permanently restrained and enjoined from, directly or indirectly, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security, by the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or any facility of any national securities exchange: (a) employing any device, scheme or artifice to defraud; or (b) making any untrue statement of material fact or omitting to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) engaging in any act, practice or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person, in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C.
Hyatt, his officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with him who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise, and each of them are permanently restrained and enjoined from, the offer or sale of any securities, by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by the use of the mails, directly or indirectly, employing any device, scheme or artifice to defraud, in violation of Section 17(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant Hyatt, his officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with him who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise, and each of them are permanently restrained and enjoined from, in the offer or sale of any securities by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by the use of the mails, directly or indirectly, obtaining money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or engaging in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser, in violation of Section 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C.
Defendant Hyatt shall satisfy this obligation by paying $7,849,318 to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission within 90 days after entry of this Final Judgment.
Hyatt (“Defendant Hyatt”) having previously consented to the entry of a Partial Final Judgment and Order of Permanent Injunction and Other Relief (ECF.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant Hyatt, his officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with him who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise, and each of them are permanently restrained and enjoined from, directly or indirectly, effecting transactions in securities for the accounts of others in exchange for transaction based compensation, by the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the Case: 1:08-cv-02224 Document #: 1064 Filed: 03/01/21 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:13448
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant Hyatt disgorge $5,527,917 in ill-gotten gains received as a result of the conduct alleged in the complaint, plus $2,321,401 in prejudgment interest on those gains.
Labor & working conditionsSettlement
Hyatt settles workplace discrimination lawsuit
Hyatt will pay $85,000 and provide paid leave to settle a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
NEW YORK - Grand Hyatt New York, Inc., which operates a large hotel in New York City, violated federal civil right law by refusing to accommodate an employee with a chronic back impairment, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit announced today.
According to the EEOC's lawsuit, Hyatt violated federal civil rights law by refusing to accommodate an employee with a back impairment. Prolonged standing as a front desk agent aggravated the employee's impairment and caused him severe pain. The employee requested a reasonable accommodation, namely that the hotel permit him to sit on a chair while working at the front desk.
Under the consent decree resolving the lawsuit, Grand Hyatt will pay $85,000 and provide six weeks of paid leave to the aggrieved employee, and also will provide him a chair so he can perform his duties seated.
According to the EEOC's lawsuit, Hyatt violated federal civil rights law by refusing to accommodate an employee with a back impairment.
NEW YORK -Hyatt Corporation, which operates the Grand Hyatt hotel in New York City, will pay $85,000, provide paid leave worth approximately $15,000, and furnish other relief to settle a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency announced today.
Media & the pressConfirmed
Hyatt faces $149M punitive damages award
A state appellate court upholds a $149 million punitive damages award against Hyatt.
The agency said Hyatt should’ve treated the fund as its own property and mailed the corporation a notice of deficiency for the tax year of 2005 as well as 2008-2011.
Workplace equityConfirmed
Employee requested disability accommodation at Grand Hyatt New York
The employee requested that Grand Hyatt New York permit a reasonable accommodation for his disability while working at the front desk.
The employee requested that Grand Hyatt New York provide a reasonable accommodation to his disability and suggested that the hotel permit him to sit on a chair while working at the front desk.
Corporate conductSettlement
Hyatt settlement over consumer protection law
The AG accused Hyatt of hiding these fees in customer bills and violating Texas consumer protection laws.
NEW YORK, May 16 (Reuters) - Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit on Monday against Hyatt Hotels Corp for allegedly violating Texas consumer protection laws by misleading consumers with marketing and charging hidden fees.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton accused Hyatt in the 2023 lawsuit of adding in online booking “hidden fees” that it describes as “resort fees,” “destination fees,” “miscellaneous fees,” “service charges,” “Recovery Fees” and “Tourism Public Improvement District fees.”
The AG accused Hyatt of hiding these fees in customer bills and violating Texas consumer protection laws.
Hyatt Hotels will have to pay $1.25 million to settle a lawsuit over charging "junk fees." The AG accused Hyatt of hiding these fees in customer bills and violating Texas consumer protection laws.
Hyatt Hotels is paying $1.25 million to settle a lawsuit from the Texas Attorney General for charging "junk fees"
Hyatt Hotels paying $1.25 million to settle Texas AG lawsuit over 'junk fees' | FOX 26 Houston
The settlement now requires Hyatt to disclose any fees in the price upfront.