Choice can get this wrong — tell us if something's off.
Lyft will pay $25 million to settle claims it concealed safety issues before its IPO.
Lyft will pay $25 million to settle claims it hid safety issues before its IPO
Their efforts follow a recent investigation by Consumer Reports, which found that Uber and Lyft routinely charge different customers significantly different prices for rides ordered at roughly the same times.
Their efforts follow a recent investigation by Consumer Reports, which found that Uber and Lyft routinely charge different customers significantly different prices for rides ordered at roughly the same times.
How Uber and Lyft Use Artificial Intelligence to Price Rides - Consumer Reports
The attorney general’s office accused Uber and Lyft of withholding drivers wages in the form of sales taxes and black car fund fee.
The investigation evaluated whether Lyft’s practices may have violated Executive Law § 63(12), Article 6 of the NYLL , including NYLL § 193 (with respect to illegal deductions), § 195 (with respect to the provision of hiring notices and earning statements), and § 196-b and New York City Administrative Code § 20-
Enrollment in that program is automatic for all gig workers and taxi drivers, with benefits paid for through a passenger surcharge collected instantly via fares. It made headlines in 2023, when the state secured a US$328 million settlement after Uber and Lyft withheld pay and benefits from workers. That settlement included mandatory paid sick leave, minimum pay and other benefits.
The attorney general’s office accused Uber and Lyft of withholding drivers wages in the form of sales taxes and black car fund fee
New York state’s investigation into Uber and Lyft’s wage theft was handled by the New York’s Labor Bureau, part of the Division for Social Justice, which is led by Chief Deputy Attorney General Meghan Faux and overseen by First Deputy Attorney General Jennifer Levy.
The settlements resolve multi-year investigations into Uber and Lyft, which found that the companies improperly collected sales tax and the Black Car Fund surcharges from New York drivers rather than passengers.
Lyft lured drivers with false claims about pay, FTC says.
Lyft lured drivers with false claims about pay, FTC says.
Lyft intentionally failed to pay at least the applicable minimum wage to its drivers for non-productive hours, subjecting it to civil penalties under Labor Code § 1197.1(a).
Lyft’s failure to pay at least the applicable minimum wage to its drivers for “non - productive” hours worked was intentional, within the meaning of Labor Code § 1197.1(a), and subjects Lyft to civil penalties as provided by that statute.
Lyft’s failure to pay its drivers at least the applicable minimum wage for their required rest periods was intentional, within the meaning of Labor Code § 1197.1, and subjects defendants to civil penalties.
Lyft’s failure to pay required minimum wages, rest period wages, rest period premium pay, and overtime wages to its drivers on the pay days for which such wages were due under Labor Code § 204 violated the requirements of that statute, and these violations were willful or intentional, thereby subjecting Lyft to civil penalties under Labor Code § 210.
In July 2020, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, a Democrat, sued Uber and Lyft for classifying drivers as contractors, alleging violations of state wage and labor laws while accusing the companies of getting a "free ride" and having "profited greatly" from "systematically" denying drivers "basic workplace protections and benefits.".
In July 2020, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, a Democrat, sued Uber and Lyft for classifying drivers as contractors, alleging violations of state wage and labor laws while accusing the companies of getting a "free ride" and having "profited greatly" from "systematically" denying drivers "basic workplace protections and benefits."
Lyft settles for concealing defects in its electronic bikes that led to injuries and prior shortfalls before its 2019 IPO.
They also said Lyft concealed the shortfalls before its March 2019 initial public offering, and also concealed defects in its electronic bikes that led to numerous injuries.
Lyft settles shareholder lawsuit over sexual assaults by drivers
Lyft is accused of paying $300,000 to settle allegations of violating New York State regulatory laws.
Lyft To Pay $300,000 For Violating New York State Regulatory Laws - CBS New York
The New York state Attorney General's office sued Lyft last summer for operating in the state without requiring its drivers to have commercial licenses or proper insurance.
Lyft is accused of causing monetary harm to individual drivers as a result of alleged actions, with recovered funds to be distributed to them.
In other words, they assert that monetary harm was al- legedly suffered by individual drivers as a result of Lyft’s alleged actions—and that any money ultimately collected as a result of the officials’ suit is to be meted out to those drivers, just as a recovery in a class action is distributed to members of the class.
Lyft exploited this fact, designing the promotion to minimize payout while maximizing the number of drivers who work extra hours.
Lyft exploited this fact, designing the promotion to minimize payout while maximizing the number of drivers who work extra hours.