OSHA enforcement inspection: 345269922. Employer: TESLA, INC.. Worksite: FREMONT, CA. Case status: CLOSED. Terminal outcome: Final Order. Outcome date: 2026-07-06. Current penalties: $850.00. Initial penalties: $850.00. Citation 01002: OSHA violation type O; standard 3340(C)(2)(A); terminal outcome Final Order on 2026-07-06; current penalty $850.00; abatement complete 3.
THE JURY’S VERDICT On October 4, 2021, the jury returned a verdict against Tesla. See Verdict Form [Dkt. No. 301]. The jury, in special verdicts, found that: (1) Tesla subjected Diaz to a racially hostile work environment, (2) Tesla was a joint employer of Diaz, (3) Diaz was subject to a hostile work environment caused by a supervisor, (4) Diaz was subject to a hostile work environment caused by a non-immediate supervisor or co-worker, (5) Tesla committed a civil rights violation in a contractual relationship, (6) Tesla failed to take all reasonable steps necessary to prevent Diaz from being subject to racial harassment, and (7) Tesla negligently supervised or negligently continued to employ Ramon Martinez and that action harmed Diaz. Id. at 1–2. Diaz sought only Case 3:17-cv-06748-WHO Document 328 Filed 04/13/22 Page 11 of 43 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court Northern District of California non-economic—that is, emotional—damages. The jury awarded him $4,500,000 in past compensatory damages; $2,400,000 in future compensatory damages; and $130,000,000 in punitive damages. Id.
Tesla entered a consent agreement and final order resolving alleged RCRA violations at its Fremont, California facility and agreed to pay a civil penalty of $31,000
Tesla entered a consent agreement and final order resolving alleged RCRA violations at its Fremont, California facility and agreed to pay a civil penalty of $31,000.
EPA enforcement case number: 09-2019-0029. Case name: Tesla Motors, Inc.. Defendants: Tesla, Inc.. Case status: Final Order Issued. Enforcement outcome: Final Order With Penalty. Case status date: 2019-03-28. Total federal penalty: $31,000.00. Laws and sections: RCRA 3002: Standards Applicable to Generators of Hazardous Waste, 3005: Permits for Treatment Storage or Disposal of Hazardous Waste. Case summary: This is a Consent Agreement and Final Order between US EPA and Tesla, Inc. (Respondent), for Respondent's alleged violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) at its Fremont, California facility. Under this Order, Respondent will pay a civil penalty of $31,000 and agreed to implement a Supplemental Environmental Project (SEP) at a cost of no less than $55,000. The SEP will provide safety equipment to the City of Fremont Fire Department. As a requirement of settlement of this matter, Respondent has also certified that the facility is in compliance with the RCRA regulations..
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that Elon Musk, CEO and Chairman of Silicon Valley-based Tesla Inc., has agreed to settle the securities fraud charge brought by the SEC against him last week. The SEC also today charged Tesla with failing to have required disclosure controls and procedures relating to Musk’s tweets, a charge that Tesla has agreed to settle. The settlements, which are subject to court approval, will result in comprehensive corporate governance and other reforms at Tesla—including Musk’s removal as Chairman of the Tesla board—and the payment by Musk and Tesla of financial penalties. According to the SEC’s complaint against him, Musk tweeted on August 7, 2018 that he could take Tesla private at $420 per share — a substantial premium to its trading price at the time — that funding for the transaction had been secured, and that the only remaining uncertainty was a shareholder vote. The SEC’s complaint alleged that, in truth, Musk knew that the potential transaction was uncertain and subject to numerous contingencies. Musk had not discussed specific deal terms, including price, with any potential financing partners, and his statements about the possible transaction lacked an adequate basis in fact. According to the SEC’s complaint, Musk’s misleading tweets caused Tesla’s stock price to jump by over six percent on August 7, and led to significant market disruption. According to the SEC’s complaint against Tesla, despite notifying the market in 2013 that it intended to use Musk’s Twitter account as a means of announcing material information about Tesla and encouraging investors to review Musk’s tweets, Tesla had no disclosure controls or procedures in place to determine whether Musk’s tweets contained information required to be disclosed in Tesla’s SEC filings. Nor did it have sufficient processes in place to that Musk’s tweets were accurate or complete.
Recalls a product over a documented safety risk — 2 findings
Tesla recalled certain 2017, 2021-2023 Model 3, 2020-2023 Model Y, 2021-2023 Model S, and Model X vehicles operating software version 2026.8.6 because the rearview camera image may be delayed when the vehicle is placed in reverse
Tesla recalled certain 2017, 2021-2023 Model 3, 2020-2023 Model Y, 2021-2023 Model S, and Model X vehicles operating software version 2026.8.6 because the rearview camera image may be delayed when the vehicle is placed in reverse.
Manufacturer: Tesla, Inc. NHTSA campaign: 26V283000. Vehicle: 2021 TESLA MODEL Y. Component: BACK OVER PREVENTION:SOFTWARE. Report received: 05/05/2026. Potential units affected: 218868. Tesla, Inc. (Tesla) is recalling certain 2017, 2021-2023 Model 3, 2020-2023 Model Y, 2021-2023 Model S, and Model X vehicles operating software version 2026.8.6. The rearview camera image may be delayed when the vehicle is placed in reverse. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard number 111, "Rear Visibility.". A delayed rearview image reduces the driver's view behind the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash. Tesla has released an over-the-air (OTA) software update, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed July 3, 2026. Owners may contact Tesla customer service at 1-877-798-3752. Tesla's number for this recall is SB-26-00-001.
Share: Share it on Facebook Share it on Twitter Copy Link Print Page Copy link Recalled Powerwall 2 AC Battery System Recalled Powerwall 2 AC Battery System (Product Nameplate Sticker) Recalled Powerwall 2 AC Battery System (Product Nameplate Sticker) Recalled Powerwall 2 AC Battery System (installed) Name of Product: Certain Tesla Powerwall 2 AC Battery Power System Hazard: The lithium-ion battery cells in certain Powerwall 2 systems can cause the unit to stop functioning during normal use, which can result in overheating and, in some cases, smoke or flame and can cause death or serious injury due to fire and burn hazards. Remedy: Replace Recall Date: November 13, 2025 Units: About 10,500 Consumer Contact Tesla Support team by email at powerwallsupportna@tesla.com or toll-free at 877-961-7652 Monday through Friday 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. PT or online at https://tesla.com/support/energy/powerwall/own/powerwall-2-replacement or https://tesla.com and click on Energy , then select Support → Powerwall → Owners for more information. Website E-mail Phone Recall Details Description: This recall involves certain Tesla Powerwall 2 units, fully-integrated AC battery systems used for energy storage for self-consumption, time-based control, and backup power. Model number “Powerwall 2” is printed on the nameplate label on the side of the unit. Remedy: Consumers should ensure their Powerwall 2 system is online and check the Tesla App for a notification about whether their unit is included in the recall. Tesla has remotely discharged (or removed energy from the battery of) affected Powerwall 2 systems that are online, to prevent overheating, until the replacement is installed. Incidents/Injuries: The firm has received 22 reports of overheating, including six reports of smoking and five reports of fire, resulting in minor property damage.
Major action
Tesla was filed as the respondent in an NLRB case alleging 8(a)(1) coercive statements
Tesla was filed as the respondent in an NLRB case alleging 8(a)(1) coercive statements.
TESLA, INC. E-File Follow Sign into MyNLRB to follow cases and receive updates. What is this? Case Number: 32-CA-220777 Date Filed: 05/23/2018 Status: Open Location: Fremont, CA Region Assigned: Region 32, Oakland, California Docket Activity Date Document Issued/Filed By 11/16/2022 Service Documents to Board NLRB - Board 11/15/2022 Errata NLRB - Board 08/29/2022 Amended Board Decision NLRB - Board 03/25/2021 Board Decision NLRB - Board 03/23/2021 Amicus Brief Amicus 03/23/2021 Amicus Brief Amicus 03/22/2021 Amicus Brief Charging Party 03/22/2021 Amicus Brief Amicus 03/22/2021 Amicus Brief Charged Party / Respondent 03/22/2021 Amicus Brief Amicus The Docket Activity list does not reflect all actions in this case. * This document may require redactions before it can be viewed. To obtain a copy, please file a request through our FOIA Branch . Related Documents Related Documents data is not available. Allegations 8(a)(1) Coercive Statements (Threats, Promises of Benefits, etc.) Participants Participant Address Phone Charging Party Notification Sodko, Jeffery International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW), AFL-CIO Law Department 8000 E Jefferson Avenue Detroit, MI 48214-3963 Charged Party / Respondent Legal Representative Morris, Keahn Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 (415)774-2934 Charging Party Legal Representative FEINBERG, MARGO Margo Feinberg, Daniel Curvy Schwartz, Steinsapir, Dohrmann & Sommers 6300 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 2000 LOS ANGELES, CA 90048 (323)655-4700 Charged Party / Respondent Legal Representative Ross, Mark Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP 4 Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 (415)774-2930 Charged Party / Respondent Employer Tesla, Inc. 45500 Fremont Blvd.
No company can pay to be listed, removed, or rated differently —
How Choice researches company records. The extension
sends a domain, never your browsing history, and your values never leave your
device — what Choice stores.
Shop by your values — not someone else’s
Choice shows what’s behind a product right on the page you’re on, and ranks companies by the issues you care about. No opinion baked in — just what companies do, and your priorities.
Sourced, not opinion. Every finding links to primary reporting.
Tuned to you. Pick the values that matter; Choice matches companies to them.
