Choice Company directory
ColourPop — Company research | Choice 33 Choice score Out of 100

Does this score look right?

Updated

What Choice found

Treehugger reported that ColourPop develops, tests and manufactures products in Southern California, which it said helps avoid factory-side forced and child labor risks. But the outlet noted the brand uses mica, whose mining can involve unsafe and unethical conditions, and does not disclose ingredient origins or publish a human-rights policy. Treehugger said it received no response to its inquiry.

You decide Labor & working conditions
Sources
https://www.treehugger.com/is-colourpop-cruelty-free-5267981
The good news is that ColourPop's product development, testing, and manufacturing occur all under one roof in Southern California, which makes it easy to avoid human rights issues like forced and child labor on the factory side of things. However, it doesn't mean that the ingredients used for ColourPop cosmetics are necessarily ethical.

Treehugger said ColourPop’s rapid product launches encourage overconsumption and criticized its lack of ingredient-sourcing disclosure and sale of polyethylene glitter without disposal guidance. Seed Beauty said vertical integration limits excess inventory and local manufacturing reduces shipping impacts, and described its work as socially, economically and ecologically responsible. The outlet said ColourPop fell short of its Green Beauty venture

You decide Climate & energy
Sources
https://www.treehugger.com/is-colourpop-cruelty-free-5267981
ColourPop exemplifies the beauty equivalent of fast fashion. A scroll through the brand's YouTube channel reveals new collection and collaboration announcements on a weekly basis. The brand is proud of its outrageous production pace, saying it's "dedicated to newness at lightning speed," but critics say the hyperconsumption model on which it's based is wildly unsustainable.
https://www.treehugger.com/is-colourpop-cruelty-free-5267981
ColourPop is the epitome of vibrant cosmetics. The brand is known for its highly saturated palettes and playful Lippie Stix, which sell by the boat load at $7 a pop. It's certified cruelty free but not by what's widely considered to be the leading accreditation body. The brand also churns out product at a much faster pace than what's considered environmentally friendly.
https://www.treehugger.com/is-colourpop-cruelty-free-5267981
Some say its collections are just too large and transitory to be eco-friendly.
https://www.treehugger.com/is-colourpop-cruelty-free-5267981
ColourPop says it prides itself on "being wallet-friendly and bunny-approved," but it isn't actually certified cruelty free by the esteemed Leaping Bunny organization. It is certified by PETA's Beauty Without Bunnies program, known to be less stringent than Leaping Bunny.

Kacey Wilson alleged ColourPop sold eye cosmetics with color additives not approved for use around the eyes and marketed unsafe products. In April 2023, a federal judge found the claims impliedly preempted because they relied on enforcing federal law, which does not permit private suits. A September report said the judge also found Wilson had not shown harm.

Against Corporate conduct
Sources
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/litigation/colourpop-eye-makeup-consumer-claims-barred-by-federal-law
Kacey Wilson sued in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging ColourPop violated California consumer protection laws by selling cosmetics with color ingredients that aren’t approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use around the eye area.
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/product-liability-and-toxics-law/colourpop-free-of-suit-claiming-deceptive-eye-makeup-marketing
Kacey Wilson sued in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging that ColourPop products are unsafe for use in the eye area because they contain ingredients that aren’t safe for use near the eyes.

Treehugger reported that about 300 of ColourPop’s more than 1,000 products contain animal-derived ingredients, making the brand relatively accessible to vegan shoppers. The company labels vegan products online and lists non-vegan items together; its false eyelashes and brushes use synthetic fibers. Non-vegan products may contain carmine, a red dye derived from insects.

In favor Animal welfare
Sources
https://www.treehugger.com/is-colourpop-cruelty-free-5267981
Considering ColourPop has more than 1,000 products—counting colorways of each item—in their repertoire at all times, the fact that only about 300 of them contain animal products makes it one of the more vegan-accessible drugstore brands on the market.

In October 2020, a federal court granted final approval to a $2.8 million settlement resolving Telephone Consumer Protection Act class-action claims over unwanted ColourPop Cosmetics text messages. The judge approved about $1.4 million in attorneys’ fees and expenses but denied a requested $5,000 service award to class representative Anita Jairam, citing an appellate decision.

Against Privacy & surveillance
Sources
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/class-action/colourpop-resolves-suit-over-unwanted-texts-for-2-8-million
A $2.8 million settlement for Colourpop Cosmetics to resolve Telephone Consumer Protection Act class action claims over unwanted text messages has been granted final approval by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
About & ownership
Category
Cosmetics
Website
colourpop.com
Alternatives to ColourPop