Choice can get this wrong — tell us if something's off.
1–10 of 14
Privacy & surveillanceSettlement
Walt Disney Co. settles for $2.75 million over CCPA privacy violations
Walt Disney Co. pays $2.75 million to settle allegations it violated the California Consumer Privacy Act by failing to comply with consumer requests to opt out of data sharing.
Walt Disney Co. will pay $2.75 million to settle allegations that it violated the California Consumer Privacy Act by not fully complying with consumers' requests to opt out of data sharing on its streaming services, the state attorney general's office said Wednesday.
OAKLAND — California Attorney General Rob Bonta today announced a settlement with the Walt Disney Company (Disney), resolving allegations that the company violated the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) by failing to fully effectuate consumers’ requests to opt-out of the sale or sharing of their data across all devices and streaming services associated with consumers' Disney accounts.
Walt Disney Co. will pay $2.75 million to settle allegations that it violated the California Consumer Privacy Act by not fully complying with consumers’ requests to opt out of data sharing on its streaming services, the state attorney general’s office said Wednesday.
The Walt Disney Co. has agreed to pay a record $2.75 million to resolve allegations that it violated the California Consumer Privacy Act, a groundbreaking measure passed by the state's Legislature in 2018 that gives consumers more control over the information businesses collect on them.
Workplace equitySettlement
Disney settles pay inequity claims with $43 million payout
Disney settled a pay inequity class action from female employees with a $43 million payout.
Less than a year since Disney finally settled a pay inequity class action from female employees with a $43 million payout, the company now is facing similar claims in a new suit from one of its former top lawyers.
Disney Sued By Former Top Lawyer For Discrimination & Retaliation
Privacy & surveillanceSettlement
Disney settles privacy violations with $2.75 million
Disney settled privacy violations by paying $2.75 million and implementing opt-out methods to stop the sale or sharing of consumers' personal information.
California Won't Let It Go: Attorney General Bonta Announces $2.75 Million Settlement with Disney, Largest CCPA Settlement in California History | State of California - Department of Justice - Office of the Attorney General
Today, my office secured the largest settlement to date under the CCPA over Disney's failure to stop selling and sharing the data of consumers that explicitly asked it to,” said Attorney General Bonta.
Under today’s settlement, Disney must pay $2.75 million in civil penalties and must implement opt-out methods that fully stop Disney’s sale or sharing of consumers’ personal information.
Corporate conductAllegation
Walt Disney Co. is accused of use of facial recognition technology
Walt Disney Co. is accused of using facial recognition technology, alleging violations of privacy, competition, and consumer protection laws.
A class action lawsuit was filed against The Walt Disney Co. over its use of facial recognition technology, alleging violations of privacy, competition, and consumer protection laws.
Corporate conductAllegation
Disney is accused of raising streaming prices
Disney is accused of engaging in various forms of conduct to raise the prices of Streaming Live Pay Television.
(b) that the true costs incurred in connection with Disney+ had been concealed by Disney executives by debuting certain content intended for Disney+ initially on Disney’s legacy distribution channels and then making the shows available on Disney+ thereafter in order to improperly shift costs out of the Disney+ segment;
(b) that the true costs incurred in connection with Disney+ had been concealed by Disney executives by debuting certain content intended for Disney+
Furthermore, the 2022 Proxy was false and misleading because it failed to disclose the following adverse facts pertaining to the Company’s business, operations, and financial condition, which were known to or recklessly disregarded by Defendants as follows: (a) that Disney+ was suffering decelerating subscriber growth, losses, and cost overruns; (b) that the true costs incurred in connection with Disney+ had been concealed by Disney executives by debuting certain content intended for Disney+ initially on Disney’s legacy distribution channe ls and then making the shows available on Disney+ thereafter in order to improperly shift costs out of the Disney+ segment; (c) that DMED had made platform distribution decisions based not on consumer preference, consumer behavior, or the desire to maximize the size of the audience for the content as represented, but based on the desire to hide the full costs of building Disney+’s content library; (d) that the Company was not on track to achieve its 2024 Disney+ paid global subscriber and profitability targets, t hat such targets were not achievable, and that such estimates lacked a reasonable basis in fact; and (e) that, as a result of (a)-(d) above, defendants had materially misrepresented the actual performance of Disney+, the sustainability of Disney+’s historical growth trends, the profitability of Disney+, and the likelihood that Disney could achieve its 2024 Disney+ subscriber and profitability targets.
According to The Hollywood Reporter, the Mouse House faces an identical investor suit over an alleged “cost-shifting scheme” in its streaming division and claims that it obstructed a deal between TSG Entertainment Finance and 20th Century Studios, which Disney owns, to “prop up” Disney+ and juice its stock price.
Disney sued over 'fraudulent scheme' to hide streaming losses
Walt Disney World for years has violated water pollution levels set by the Environmental Protection Agency and could face fines of as much as $25,000 a day because the problem has worsened since June.
Corporate conductAllegation
Disney accused of anticompetitive agreements
Disney is accused of entering anticompetitive agreements with direct competitors in the streaming live pay television market.
“This is an antitrust lawsuit against The Walt Disney Company (‘Disney’) to remediate and recover for Disney’s anticompetitive agreements with direct competitors in the market for streaming live pay television (’SLPTV’) — live television streamed over the Internet to pay subscribers,” court documents reads.
Workplace equityConfirmed
Disney ends discriminatory initiatives
Disney ends any and all discriminatory initiatives in substance, not just name.
"I want to ensure that Disney ends any and all discriminatory initiatives in substance, not just name," Carr wrote in the letter, which was seen by Reuters.
Corporate conductSettlement
The Walt Disney Company settles for $50 million
The Walt Disney Company settled a class action lawsuit alleging violations of federal antitrust and consumer protection laws.
The Walt Disney Company has agreed to pay $50 million to settle a class action suit (1) from 2022. That could mean some money is coming your way. The case revolves around allegations that Disney entered into "anticompetitive agreements with YouTube TV" and other live-streaming services that resulted in subscription price increases from over-the-top live TV services.
The Walt Disney $DIS Company agreed to pay $50 million to settle a federal antitrust class action lawsuit alleging it drove up subscription prices for YouTube TV and DirecTV Stream, though the company denied any wrongdoing.
The Walt Disney Company has agreed to a $50 million settlement in a class action lawsuit that alleged the media giant violated federal antitrust and consumer protection laws.