In January 2026, Pat McGrath said GDA’s control of incoming revenue hindered inventory and vendor payments and that the Chapter 11 filing halted an asset auction she considered harmful. GDA disputed her account, alleged reckless borrowing and challenged her proposed financing; the filing terminated the auction, according to a press release.
Sources
https://www.retaildive.com/news/pat-mcgrath-cosmetics-bankruptcy-lender-dispute/810610/
The beauty brand entered into a loan agreement in April 2025 with GDA that was intended to serve as a short-term solution for Pat McGrath Cosmetics’ financial issues, according to the Chapter 11 declaration filing. Pat McGrath Cosmetics then amended the agreement with GDA a few months later that “significantly increased GDA’s control over” incoming revenues.
https://www.retaildive.com/news/pat-mcgrath-cosmetics-bankruptcy-lender-dispute/810610/
McGrath said the brand faced a disagreement about material obligations with one lender, GDA PMG Funding, wherein the brand allegedly received $17.5 million in loan advances, but the lender asserts there is a $43 million outstanding balance, according to the filing. GDA filed an objection to the proposed DIP financing on Tuesday, stating that GDA is owed $30.5 million in principal, exclusive of certain interest and fees.